HC Deb 27 June 1951 vol 489 c1347
4. Surgeon Lieut.-Commander Bennett

asked the Parliamentary Secretary to the Admiralty why no safety device is used for His Majesty's submarines consisting of a buoy or buoys attached to suitable places in the hull or casing by a magnetic device in such a way that when the ship's electrical system goes dead the buoy is automatically released.

Mr. Callaghan

Similar methods to the one proposed have been rejected in the past for technical and other reasons. But I will have the existing policy reviewed in the light of the recent disaster.

Surgeon Lieut.-Commander Bennett

While it is admitted that a buoy of this kind is only primarily useful possibly for the saving of life, would it not have cut short the search to a satisfactory extent if an automatic release on a submarine in distress were possible?

Mr. Callaghan

I am not sure that I agree with the first part of the question. As regards the second part, the answer is obviously "Yes," and that is why I am having the policy reviewed.

Surgeon Lieut.-Commander Bennett

Is the hon. Gentleman aware that the objection mentioned in the first part of my supplementary question comes from a letter from one of his officials as a ground for rejecting any such scheme, and will he consider the scheme afresh?

Mr. Callaghan

There is only one official voice for the Admiralty in this House, and that is mine.

Hon, Members: Oh.