§ 57. Mr. Llewellynasked the Postmaster-General what redress a telephone subscriber has when he is charged for a call which he did not make, or for a longer period of conversation than actually took place, in cases in which the Post Office authorities do not concede the accuracy of his contentions resisting the imposition of a charge.
§ Mr. Ness EdwardsI am satisfied that the subscriber is safeguarded by the practice described in my reply of 4th July to the hon. and gallant Member for Scotstoun (Colonel J. R. H. Hutchison).