HC Deb 05 April 1951 vol 486 cc372-3
38. Mr. Redmayne

asked the Minister of Health the average delay in final settlement of chemists' accounts as at 30th June, 1949, 31st December, 1949, 30th June, 1950, 31st December, 1950, and at today's date.

Mr. Blenkinsop

Four, six, seven and a half, eight and a half and nine months, respectively.

Mr. Redmayne

Is the Parliamentary Secretary aware that these figures are correct, except for the latest figure which, according to my information, is 11 months? Is that not far too long?

Mr. Blenkinsop

We regard nine months as far too long, and we are doing what we can to reduce it.

Mr. Joynson-Hicks

Is the hon. Gentleman satisfied with this increasing trend? Cannot he reverse it?

Mr. Blenkinsop

We are far from satisfied and are taking every step open to us, particularly by trying to open more premises in which the Joint Pricing Committee can work. We are quite sure that the position will improve.

Mr. Jennings

Does the Parliamentary Secretary not agree that three months' credit for a Government Department is quite long enough?

Mr. Blenkinsop

Perhaps the hon. Member does not realise that the total payments are as up to date as they were before the war. Very large sums are paid on account.

33. Mr. Redmayne

asked the Minister of Health what percentage of the full amount owing each month is paid to chemists under the National Health Service.

Mr. Blenkinsop

Chemists are paid monthly on account 90 per cent. of the estimated value of the prescriptions dispensed by them in the previous month.

Mr. Redmayne

Does the Parliamentary Secretary realise that even if 90 per cent. is correct he has the use of some £1 million of chemists' money a year without interest?

Mr. Blenkinsop

We make supplementary payments in addition to the 90 per cent. to give relief to difficulties which may arise where cases are brought to our notice. We do not think that the chemists are handicapped.