§ 17. Sir Wavell Wakefieldasked the Minister of Health what steps he proposes to take to have defined more clearly what is a fair rent for the guidance of rent tribunals and the law courts; and when does he propose to widen the appeal allowed to a divisional court against rent tribunal decisions from the one issue of jurisdiction to all issues.
§ Sir W. WakefieldIs the Minister aware that the Lord Chief Justice has stated that it is most unsatisfactory that there is no proper definition of a fair rent, and has also commented on the narrowness of the right of appeal? In view of that statement, and of experience gained in the working of the Act, will not the right hon. Gentleman reconsider the decision?
§ Mr. BevanI have not seen the statement alleged to have been made by the Lord Chief Justice, but the House is master of its own legislation.
§ Mr. Derek Walker-SmithIs the right hon. Gentleman aware that there is no right of appeal at all, and that the divisional court intervenes only in questions of jurisdiction? Does he agree that in view of the very large number of cases in which they have quashed the findings there ought to be a right of appeal?
§ Mr. BevanThis matter was very fully discussed by the House when the Bill was before it. The House has taken its decision on the matter and, until it varies it, that decision will stand.
§ Mr. S. SilvermanIn view of the reference to the Lord Chief Justice, will the Minister consider the advisability of sending him a copy of the proceedings of this House, in which the matter was debated at great length, so that he may be aware of the reasons that led to the legislation?
§ Mr. BevanI shall certainly find out what the Lord Chief Justice has said on this matter and acquaint him with the facts.