§ 6. Mr. Fitzroy Macleanasked the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs whether he has any further statement to make regarding the negotiations in progress between His Majesty's Government and the Communist authorities in Peking.
§ Mr. YoungerYes, Sir. On 17th June His Majesty's Charge d'Affaires at Peking delivered a reply to the Chinese Government's 1266 communication of 8th May in which they requested further elucidation of His Majesty's Government's attitude on two main questions, namely, Chinese representation on the United Nations and Chinese State property in British territory. Our position on both questions is already known, and there is nothing I can usefully add at this present stage to what my right hon. Friend said in the House on 24th May.
§ Mr. MacleanWill the Minister of State give a firm assurance that the Government will not alter their attitude at U.N.O. or anywhere else simply to meet Communist demands?
§ Mr. YoungerI think I have already said, in answer to a previous Question on the subject, that there is no question of a deal or appeasement in this matter.
§ Mr. GammansWill the hon. Gentleman say what he means by "Chinese State property in British territory"?
§ Mr. YoungerI think the property which is causing the arguments is aircraft which are claimed as such by the Chinese in Hong Kong.
§ Mr. YoungerPrecisely. This is a matter which, as my right hon. Friend has said, must be settled by the courts.
Air-Commodore HarveyIs the hon. Gentleman aware that there is concern in this country at the way the British Government have been humiliated by the Communist Government in Peking?