HC Deb 02 March 1949 vol 462 cc363-4
56. Mr. Marlowe

asked the Minister of Food what are the reasons which have led him to the decision to restrict the distribution of flour to the individual baker to the amount allocated to the baker at the time bread rationing ended; and why, without affecting the total amount distributed, it is not possible to adjust the allocations so that the enterprising and efficient baker can expand his business and the customer buy at the baker of his choice.

Mr. Strachey

I explained the reasons for introducing the flour restriction scheme in the statement I made to the House on 21st July, 1948. It is impossible for me to undertake the task of deciding which bakers are more enterprising and efficient than others. I shall of course end the flour restriction scheme at the earliest possible moment and so restore competition amongst the bakers, which, I agree, is highly desirable.

Mr. Marlowe

Does the right hon. Gentleman realise that the present system makes it quite impossible for a flourishing business to expand? It is being pegged down to an arbitrary amount fixed by the right hon. Gentleman. What is the objection of the right hon. Gentleman to efficient people trying to improve their businesses?

Mr. Strachey

Of course, I realise that but we have had to apply this flour restriction scheme whilst supplies of flour are limited. We shall get rid of it at the earliest possible moment, and that is the only way to restore competition.

Mr. Baldwin

In view of the Minister's reply to the previous Question in which he advocated competition in the sale of kippers, why does he not advocate competition in the case of bakers so that they can get the benefit of consumer choice?

Mr. Strachey

If the hon. Member had done me the honour of listening to my reply he would know that that is precisely what I did. I believe in competition among bakers and the moment that we have the flour supplies available we shall give them out and allow free competition.