§ 52. Mr. Swinglerasked the Minister of Food what is the weekly quantity of sweets and chocolates per head of the population now being produced.
§ Mr. StracheyThe weekly production of sweets and chocolates is at present about 5 oz. per head of the population.
§ Mr. SwinglerIn view of the increased quantity of sweets now being produced, is it not a fact that some retailers are getting fewer sweets from their wholesalers than they did before derationing? Is my right hon. Friend satisfied that any improvement is taking place in distribution?
§ Mr. StracheyDistribution is carried out by the trade, but I should be very surprised if it was a fact that any retailer was actually getting fewer sweets.
§ Mr. KeenanIs my right hon. Friend aware that in spite of improved supplies to the trade, it is impossible to get sweets in any industrial area without having to queue, and that the only remedy is to get back to rationing?
Mrs. PatonIs my right hon. Friend aware that many people have not seen any chocolate since derationing? People are asking where it is. Can my right hon. Friend tell us?
§ Mr. StracheyChocolates are being bought and eaten but it is true that distribution is far more uneven than it was under rationing and that that may well be a good reason for reimposing rationing.
§ Mr. Sydney SilvermanIs my right hon. Friend aware that the decision by his Ministry to reimpose sweets rationing would be welcomed by the overwhelming majority of the people?
§ Mr. Henderson StewartIs there not an easy solution? Would not the right hon. Gentleman permit the trade to have a further small quantity of ingredients with which to increase supplies—[HON. MEMBERS "He has done so."]—which will immediately resolve all these difficulties?
§ Mr. StracheyThere is a Question later on the Order Paper which deals with this matter.
§ Mr. PiratinIs the Minister aware that just before Whitsun the Parliamentary Secretary told the House that steps would be taken, if cases were brought to her notice, to ensure that confectioners received the quantity of sweets they were receiving before derationing. I have received a letter from her since saying that no steps could be taken. I now ask the right hon. Gentleman what steps can be taken to ensure that confectioners get the same quantity of sweets as hitherto?
§ Mr. StracheyActual distribution from the manufacturer or wholesaler to the retailer is in the hands of the trade, and the total amount now being distributed is so much greater that I very much doubt whether any shop is getting less.
§ 53. Mr. Swinglerasked the Minister of Food the quantities of sugar and fats allocated to manufacturers of sweets and chocolates since derationing; and the 206 quantities allocated in the comparable period before derationing.
§ Mr. StracheyAllocations since de-rationing and for three months before have been at the rate of 15,680 tons of sugar and 865 tons of fats each four-weekly period. In addition, one further allocation of 4,500 tons of sugar and 350 tons of fats has been released for extra production. Allocations for a 4 oz. ration before de-rationing were 13,240 tons of sugar and 730 tons of fats each four-weekly period.
§ Mr. SwinglerIn view of the fact that this has enabled production to increase since derationing, will my right hon. Friend take note of the widespread protest which has been made in the House this afternoon against the unfairness caused by derationing?
§ Mr. TurtonWhen the right hon. Gentleman made an increased allocation, did he ask manufacturers to secure even distribution to small shops as well as to large multiple shops and co-operative societies?
§ Mr. StracheyYes, Sir. Whether we were right in leaving distribution so fully in the hands of the trade is another matter, but I think they are doing their best.
Mr. Ivor Owen ThomasIs it not the case that under derationing there is and can be no effective check either on distribution or the amounts produced from the quantity of ingredients supplied?
§ Mr. StracheyI agree with the first part of my hon. Friend's supplementary. Derationing and decontrol of distribution must to some extent, go together. As to the second part, I think manufacturers are producing all the sweets they can with the ingredients they are allowed.
§ 56. Mr. Blackburnasked the Minister of Food what steps he is taking, in view of the dearth of sweets in confectionery shops, to ensure a fair distribution of sweets throughout the community.
§ Mr. StracheyAs I said in the House on 3rd June, I shall not hesitate to reimpose rationing if it proves the only remedy for the present state of affairs.
§ Mr. BlackburnIs my right hon. Friend aware that the facts in relation to sweets abundantly prove how right he 207 was to ration bread? Will he make it quite clear, as almost everybody in the country wants rationing of sweets to be reintroduced, that he will take that step at the earliest possible moment if he finds it necessary?
§ Lieut.-Colonel Sir Thomas MooreSince the derationing of sweets won the South Hammersmith by-election is it wise to re-impose rationing now or to keep it for the next by-election?
§ Mr. StracheyI think the hon. and gallant Member will find that by-elections can be won quite easily in any case. In answer to my hon. Friend the Member for King's Norton (Mr. Blackburn), I would say that our position on this is quite simple. If in the case of sweets, or any other commodity, the demand at current prices is persistently in excess of the supply then we think rationing is the proper remedy.
§ Lieut.-Colonel LiptonWhat other remedies, apart from the re-imposition of rationing, is my right hon. Friend considering at the moment?
§ Mr. StracheyI know of no other remedy for the present situation. If it does not right itself with existing supplies, then I think we must re-impose rationing.
§ Mrs. MiddletonIn view of the almost unanimous opinion in the country that rationing should be re-imposed, will not the Minister avoid delay by announcing today that he will re-impose rationing?
§ Mr. StracheyI think it is a little premature to do that. After all, it is only seven weeks since sweets were de-rationed. We must wait a little longer.
§ Mr. Benn LevyIn view of the accumulated evidence, does not my right hon. Friend consider that the time has now really come to set the people free to secure their fair share?
§ Air-Commodore HarveyWill the right hon. Gentleman say why other countries in Europe, occupied by the enemy for many years, have been able to deration sweets and make them available to the public?
§ Mr. StracheyIt would be very easy indeed to maintain derationing and to have no queues by simply increasing the price, as has been done in other countries.
§ Air-Commodore HarveyRubbish
§ Mr. CollinsCan my right hon. Friend say how much longer he will defer a decision? Seven weeks have gone by. Does he think another four weeks, or a shorter period?
§ Mr. SpeakerThat question has been asked several times.