HC Deb 19 January 1949 vol 460 cc155-7
26. Mr. Piratin

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs what consultation there was between His Majesty's Government and the Canadian Government before the latter decided to recognise de facto the State of Israel; and, in view of the step taken by the Canadian Government, whether he will now review his attitude and take similar measures.

Mr. McNeil

His Majesty's Government and the Canadian Government have been in continuous contact on the subject of Palestine, and His Majesty's Government were informed by the Canadian Government of the latter's intention before recognition was granted. With regard to the attitude of His Majesty's Government I have nothing to add to the reply given yesterday to a Question by my hon. Friend, the Member for North Salford (Mr. McAdam).

Mr. Piratin

Is it the Minister's intention to wait until the last member of the United Nations has recognised the State of Israel before he does so? Is it not also the case that the unfortunate events of the last two days might have been obviated had there been any common understanding between the two sides, and had an attempt been made to reach such an understanding?

30. Squadron-Leader Fleming

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs whether he will now make a statement regarding His Majesty's Government's non-recognition of Israel.

Mr. McNeil

I have at present nothing to add to the reply given yesterday to a Question by my hon. Friend, the Member for North Salford.

Squadron-Leader Fleming

Can we hope that before very long the Government will take the honourable step of recognising the State of Israel, as has been done by other countries?

Mr. Crawley

On a point of Order. I do not wish to raise a stink but in the last quarter of an hour there has been a strong smell of burning oil in this quarter of the House and we feel, Mr. Speaker, that we ought to bring the matter to your attention.

Mr. Speaker

I will have inquiries made and see if I can get it stopped.

Mr. Stanley

Has it anything to do with inflammatory opinions held by certain Members behind the Government Front Bench?