HC Deb 12 December 1949 vol 470 cc2341-2
23. Mr. A. R. W. Low

asked the Minister of Fuel and Power whether he is aware that in many areas the maximum supplementary allowance of petrol allotted to commercial travellers is insufficient; and whether he will now immediately review his regulations to enable a higher maximum to be given in cases where it can be justified.

Mr. Gaitskell

The maximum allowances for commercial travellers were increased last February after consultation with the associations representing commercial travellers and the Association of British Chambers of Commerce. I regret that in present circumstances I could not agree to any revision that would result in a further increase of petrol consumption.

Mr. Low

Is the right hon. Gentleman not aware that the imposition of a rigid maximum such as exists today results on occasions in firms having to appoint an extra commercial traveller to cover a particular area, and does not this rigid maximum in actual fact result in limiting the amount of work that any one man can do in a day or in a given period? Is that not most undesirable in our present situation?

Mr. Gaitskell

We considered very carefully, in consultation with representatives of the commercial travellers, whether we could not have another system which, I agree, might be more equitable than the present one, but we all came to the same conclusion that it was quite impracticable.

Brigadier Prior-Palmer

Will the Minister say why it is not possible to judge each case on its merits and to allocate an extra ration of petrol to a commercial traveller who has a wider area to cover?

Mr. Gaitskell

It really is quite impossible to administer petrol rationing on the basis of every case being treated on its merits without any rules whatever.

Sir T. Moore

Is it not recognised, both in the Treasury and in the other Departments concerned, that a motor car to a commercial traveller is a tool of the trade; and did not the right hon. Gentleman himself promise me many months ago that that particular aspect of the subject would be reconsidered with a view to coming to a general decision favourable to the commercial travellers?

Mr. Gaitskell

It was reconsidered, as I have just explained, but unfortunately we came to the conclusion that a change was impracticable.

Forward to