HC Deb 24 June 1948 vol 452 cc1560-1
56. Mr. Mathers

asked the Financial Secretary to the Treasury how many prosecutions have taken place under the Importation of Plumage (Prohibition) Act, 1921, during the last five years.

Mr. Glenvil Hall

None, Sir.

Mr. Mathers

Does not that answer point to the tact that the Customs officials must be failing to detect the importation of this plumage? Apart from ostrich feathers, which are exempt, there must be large quantities of plumage illegally imported into the country, and what steps will the right hon. Gentleman take in the matter?

Mr. Glenvil Hall

I understand that no plumage is coming in.

Mr. Gallacher

Ascot.

Mr. Glenvil Hall

The explanation is that in 1921 very large quantities of these feathers were brought in—enough, I am told, to last 40 years. Fashions change, and they have not been used.

Mr. Mathers

Is not the right hon. Gentleman aware that when the Act was passed it was stated by those who knew the track that there was only enough plumage on the market to last for six months at that time?

Mr. Glenvil Hall

I have made inquiries and I am told that these feathers were there and that they would last for much longer than that.

Mr. Peter Freeman

If after 27 years they are still being used, will the Minister consider their prohibition.