§ 14. Mr. Heathcoat Amoryasked the Minister of Pensions what considerations led to the fixing of the basic rate for 100 per cent. disability at 45s. on 6th February, 1946.
§ Mr. BlenkinsopAs indicated in the reply to the hon. and gallant Member for Chertsey (Captain Marsden) on 18th November last, the basic pension rate for no per cent. disablement for the war pensioner was increased to 45s. a week in February, 1946, to bring it into line with the rate laid down for the industrially disabled pensioner under the National Insurance (Industrial Injuries) Act, 1946.
Mr. AmoryAre not the two things entirely different and is it not undeniable that the basic rate of 45s. is not generous by any test? Does not the hon. Gentleman agree that the war disabled were promised generous treatment and that public opinion in the country wants them to have it and will not grudge the cost?
Mr. BlenkisopYes, Sir, but the hon. Member must remember that the extra allowances paid to disablement pensioners are much in addition to what is afforded under the National Insurance (Industrial Injuries) Act.
§ Brigadier PetoDoes not the hon. Gentleman realise that the question of the basic 45s. is not so much one that affects those drawing a 100 per cent. pension, but those who draw pensions which are lower down the scale, and if the basic rate is increased would it not affect, in proportion, those who draw only 9s. a week now?
§ Mr. BlenkinsopCertainly, but again it must be remembered that the great bulk of the pensioners—even 100 per cent. pensioners—are earning full wages in addition to what they get from us by way of pension.
§ Sir Ronald RossDoes not the hon. Gentleman agree that the basic rate of pension has not kept pace with the increased cost of living, and should not the Minister consider the case of those who are not earning any money and are only in receipt of pension?
§ Mr. BlenkinsopCertainly. Indeed, we pay extra allowances to those who are not earning. The hon. Member suggests that these pensions have not kept pace with the increased cost of living, but I am afraid that he will find that, by strict examination of the figures, that is not so.