§ 57. Mr. Hurdasked the Chancellor of the Exchequer to what extent the sales of petrol from British sources to dollar countries have increased since the abolition of the basic petrol ration here.
§ Sir S. CrippsSales have not increased at all. The abolition of the basic ration was intended to reduce our imports from dollar sources.
§ Mr. HurdIf the Minister cannot make any statement on that score to justify the abolition of the basic petrol ration, will lie see that when any relevant information becomes available the motoring public are informed?
§ Sir S. CrippsThey have had the relevant information as to what the saving was.
§ 63. Mr. Hurdasked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will take powers to compensate those innkeepers and caterers 1639 who can show that they have lost half their business since the abolition of the basic petrol ration.
§ Sir S. CrippsNo, Sir. I regret that it is not possible to arrange for compensation in such cases.
§ Mr. HurdIs the Chancellor aware that some innkeepers have lost three-quarters of their business, and that if this goes on much longer they will be in the bankruptcy court?
§ Sir S. CrippsI am afraid that all sorts of changes in the economic situation mean losses to individuals. It is very regrettable but inevitable.
§ Lieut.-Commander BraithwaiteIs it not important that these hotels should remain solvent, in view of the importance of attracting tourists?
§ Sir S. CrippsI understand that there is no doubt that they will be open when the tourists come.
Mr. VaneIs the right hon. and learned Gentleman aware that many hotel keepers are finding that they have to dismiss their staffs because they have no trade, and in consequence they will not be open when the tourists do come?