44. Mr. H. D. Hughesasked the Secretary of State for the Colonies in how many cases banishments have been carried out under the Banishment Ordinance in Malaya; in how many cases has the order been used against aliens; what types of offences are punished by banishment; and whether he is satisfied that the Government of Malaya is using its powers under this ordinance sufficiently to break the crime wave in Malaya.
§ Mr. Rees-WilliamsForty-nine banishment orders were approved in the Malayan Union during the first nine months of this year and 102 between January and the present date in Singapore. All individuals concerned were aliens. Banishment is not a punishment but an administrative act authorised by law under certain circumstances for the public good. I am satisfied that this power is being used to the end mentioned in the last part of the Question.
Mr. HughesIs my hon. Friend aware that the responsible Press in Singapore in September published figures showing that only one-fifth of the police recommendations for banishment were being implemented by the Governor, and that the situation was being described as subversion of the Government over large areas, shooting at the police and civilians, and wholesale extortion? Is he satisfied that the recommendations of the police are being carried out satisfactorily?
§ Mr. Rees-WilliamsThe responsibility under these banishment orders is that of the Governor, and I see no cause to interfere with the Governor in the exercise of that responsibility.
§ Mr. RankinIf banishment is not to be regarded as a punishment, can we look upon it as a reward?