§ 32. Mr. Hector Hughesasked the Secretary of State for Scotland in view of the fact that the judges in Scotland who are called "sheriffs-substitute" are not, in fact, substitutes, and that this name is, therefore, misleading and undignified, if he will introduce legislation to eliminate from this title the word "substitute" so that these judges will in future be officially termed "sheriffs."
§ Mr. WestwoodI am unable to hold out any prospect of legislation on this suggestion, which has been considered on previous occasions.
§ Mr. HughesIs the Secretary of State aware that he is misinformed about this; that the legal profession in Scotland have long had ready a non-controversial draft Bill on this subject; and will he seek time for its introduction?
§ Mr. WestwoodI am aware that they may have been considering this matter, but I am equally aware that the term has been used since the year 1746. I know further that it is not non-controversial.
§ Mr. HughesBut is it not time for a change?
§ Mr. McGovernIs the Secretary of State aware that the prisoners have no objection to this change?