§ 8. Mr. Attewellasked the Secretary of State for War if he is aware of the concern of the people at the detention in this country of approximately 350,000 prisoners of war some 19 months after the cessation of hostilities; that the present scheme of repatriation of 15,000 per month will compel those captured in 1944–45 to remain in this country for long duration; and if he will consider repatriation of all married men in the immediate future and so allow families to be reunited.
§ 20. Mr. Stokesasked the Secretary of State for War on what date he expects to increase the rate of repatriation of prisoners of war from this country from the present figure of 15,000 a month to 30,000 a month.
§ Mr. J. FreemanThe present scheme of repatriation is on the basis explained in the Government's statement of 12th September, 1946. It was decided that priority of repatriation should be based on political and economic factors and length of captivity alone, with provision for special compassionate cases. There is no intention at present of changing this basis. Similarly the rate of repatriation will continue for the time being at the present rate.
§ Mr. StokesAs my hon. Friend has not answered Question No. 20, may I ask him when the Government propose to increase the number to 30,000 a month, which is the rate desired by the Control Commission in Germany? Is he also aware that the feeling of the vast majority of people in this country is that prisoners of war should be returned home before the end of this year?
§ Mr. FreemanIf my hon. Friend will read the answer I have just given to him, he will see that I did answer his Question in my last sentence. With regard to his second supplementary question, that is a matter of opinion.
§ Mr. Hector HughesIn the case of prisoners of war who are likely to remain in this country for some years, will the hon. Gentleman consider using them in industry? Will he also consider bringing their families to join them here?
§ Mr. FreemanI am not aware of any prisoners of war who are likely to stay here for some years.
§ Mr. DribergWill my hon. Friend bear in mind that I am still balloting daily for the Adjournment on this subject?
§ Mr. StokesOn a point of Order. May I join with my hon. Friend in saying that I shall seek an opportunity to debate this matter on the Adjournment? It is most unsatisfactory.