§ 41. Mr. Hoggasked the Secretary of State for War for how long 5292930 Private H. Johnson, of the Oxon and Bucks Light Infantry, has been under close arrest; what is the reason for keeping him under arrest for so long and for the delay in his trial; and what difficulties have prevented the War Office from giving a detailed reply to the request for information concerning his case sent to them by the hon. Member for Oxford City.
§ Mr. BellengerA full report on this case has been called for from India. As soon as it has been received and examined, I will write to the hon. Member.
§ Mr. HoggIs not the right hon. Gentleman aware that this soldier has been under close arrest awaiting trial in India since the early months of this year—March or April, I think—and that I wrote as long ago as July, but still no report from India has come? Is not this quite intolerable, and a case which should be examined further?
§ Mr. BellengerYes, Sir. I admit there has been some considerable delay in replying. That is the reason why I am sending a special cablegram demanding a reply with expedition.
§ Mr. HoggCan the right hon. Gentleman tell us what degree of expedition he can expect from a special cable to this Command?
§ Mr. BellengerI know that the writ of the Secretary of State for War does not run to the full extent in India as it does in other Commands, but I hope, at least, that my representations will have some effect when they are received there.
§ Major PooleCould the Minister, without notice, tell us what is the maximum period in accordance with regulations during which a man may be kept under close arrest without trial?
§ Mr. BellengerI should like notice of that question.
§ Mr. EdenWill the Minister look into the practice of the War Office in this matter? Surely, it should not be possible for a matter to lie in this state so long without some action being taken by the War Office, quite apart from representations by hon. Members.
§ Mr. BellengerThe hon. Member for Oxford (Mr. Hogg) wrote on 23rd July, and a report was called for by letter from G.H.Q. on 2nd August. A "hastener" was sent by cable on 18th September, and I regret to say that a reply has not yet been received.