§ 49. Dr. Segalasked the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster why sentences of seven months' imprisonment were passed on two members of the U.N.R.R.A. D.P. camp at Admont, Steirmark, Austria, for complaining of their accommodation while waiting at Klagenfurt to give evidence at a murder trial; and when these sentences are likely to be revised.
§ Mr. J. HyndThese persons were sentenced, not for complaining of their accommodation, but for leaving their quarters at Klagenfurt before the trial and returning to Admont, over 100 miles away, in contravention of a Military Government ordinance limiting the movements of D.Ps. to a radius of 10 kilo- 1216 metres of their quarters. Their cases are under review, and a decision can be expected shortly.
§ Dr. SegalIs the Minister aware that all these displaced persons—[HON. MEMBERS: "Speak up."]—left their quarters at Klagenfurt—[HON. MEMBERS: "Speak up."]—for an address which was perfectly well known, and were always available in case the trial took place at short notice, that five British officers who were asked their advice on this case said that the sentences were somewhat harsh —[HON. MEMBERS: "Speak up."]— and would he see that the revision of these sentences will be carried out as speedily as possible?
§ Mr. SpeakerWill the hon. Member please speak up? I have not heard a single word.
§ Mr. HyndAs I have stated in the answer, the cases are under review, and no doubt all the factors will be taken into consideration. But I must point out that they did break the ordinance, and to that extent were breaking the law applying to such cases.