§ Mr. Arthur GreenwoodMay I ask the Leader of the House if he will state the Business for next week?
§ Tuesday—It is proposed to move Mr. SPEAKER out of the Chair on going into Committee of Supply on the Air Estimates, 1945, and to consider Votes A and 1, and Air Supplementary Estimate, 1944, in Committee.
1563§ Wednesday—It is proposed to move Mr. SPEAKER out of the Chair on going into Committee of Supply on the Navy Estimates, 1945, and to consider Votes A and 1, and Navy Supplementary Estimate, 1944, in Committee.
§ Thursday—Second Reading of the Family Allowances Bill, and Committee stage of the necessary Money Resolution.
§ Friday—The Chairman of Ways and Means will propose a Motion to approve the Report from the Select Committee on Private Bill Standing Orders; Committee stage of outstanding Supplementary Estimates contained in House of Commons Paper No. 36.
§ On Thursday, at the beginning of the Business, it will be necessary for us to consider the Motion to alter the present Hours of Sitting.
§ Also during the week, and not later than Friday, it will be necessary for us to ask the House to approve the Electoral Registration Regulations, 1945.
§ Sir Percy HarrisMay I ask the Leader of the House whether, if he is going to ask the House to meet on Fridays, he could provide more subjects to occupy our time? On two Fridays recently the Adjournment was reached quite early, and it wants no imagination to see that next Friday's Business will not provide a full day.
§ Mr. EdenI will certainly consider that. My recollection is that we got through eight items of Business on one of the Fridays to which the right hon. Gentleman refers, and if the House behaves in that exemplary fashion, I can only be gratified.
§ Earl WintertonMay I ask whether the request made by me on two occasions, supported by my right hon. Friend the Member for East Edinburgh (Mr. Pethick-Lawrence) and other Members, for a Debate on the economic condition of Europe is likely to be granted in the comparatively near future, in view of the fact that there has been a Debate in another place, and that there is a growing public interest in the matter?
§ Mr. EdenI entirely share my Noble Friend's views about that, and I hope to make an announcement on the subject next week.
Mr. Graham WhiteCould my right hon. Friend say whether it is the intention of the Government to take the Family Allowances Bill in Committee of the Whole House?
§ Mr. ShinwellIn view of the disaster that has overtaken the Government in the reported resignation of the Parliamentary Secretary to the Ministry of Town and Country Planning, can my right hon. Friend now state the Government's intentions?
§ Mr. Godfrey NicholsonWill my right hon. Friend draw the attention of his colleagues to the undesirability of making statements on really important subjects, without the slightest notice, on Friday mornings? Last Friday an important statement was made; nobody in the House, so far as I know, had the slightest warning that it was to be made, and many Members who are very interested in the question had not the opportunity of being present.
§ Mr. EdenI am sure my hon. Friend will bear in mind that Friday is a Parliamentary day, like any other day. However, I quite understand the circumstances; I think we must bear them in mind, but I do not think we should say that Friday should be treated differently from other days. I would like to consider what my hon. Friend has said.
§ Mr. NicholsonSurely it is highly undesirable for important statements to be made on a day when there are no Questions. On other days, there are inspired Questions, or Private Notice Questions, which give some warning that a matter will be brought up. On a Friday, such a statement comes "out of the blue."
§ Mr. A. BevanMay I also point out that not only axe there no Questions on Friday, and therefore making use of this opportunity is, to some extent, an abuse of the clemency of Mr. Speaker, but furthermore, Friday does happen to come after Thursday, and there is thus no opportunity of asking that arrangements be 1565 made for a Debate during the succeeding week, after important announcements of that sort. The Government therefore hope that about ten days will elapse, allowing for public opinion to cool after they have launched these torpedoes.
§ Mr. EdenI really do not think the hon. Gentleman's arithmetic would stand any examination at all—
§ Mr. BevanThis is an exceedingly serious matter. It has happened on several occasions, and it really is an attempt to trick the House. It means that two week-ends must elapse before we can have a Debate on housing.
§ Mr. EdenThe hon. Gentleman really must not make these imputations. It is not an attempt to trick the House. If there is a desire for a Debate after a statement on Friday, a statement can be made the following Tuesday. We never attempt tricks of that sort. Further, if I may say so, it has nothing to do with the clemency of the Chair; it has to do with Standing Orders, and Ministers are perfectly entitled to make these statements. At the same time, I do understand the point of view concerning the convenience of Members. There is something in that point, and I would like to consider it, if I may.
§ Mr. BuchananMay I repeat a Question I put to the Leader of the House last week, regarding the Motion which certain Scottish Members have put down about Prestwick Aerodrome, and ask him whether he can give us any hope that there will be a Debate for Scottish Members, on that issue?
§ [That, in the opinion of this House, it is in the interests of civil aviation that Prestwick airport, which has throughout the war become Britain's main transoceanic airport, should continue as the principal international airport for the United Kingdom until a new airport has been completed in the London area, and should thereafter be maintained as second only in importance to the new London 1566 airport; and that immediate encouragement should be given to the conversion, production, assembly and operation of aircraft in Scotland.]
§ Mr. EdenI have considered—it is rather a subject, of course, for Mr. Speaker—whether the Easter Adjournment might not be an occasion when time could be allotted for that.
Dr. Russell ThomasCan my right hon. Friend say whether, and if so when, the Government propose to bring in legislation in regard to the new Ministry for Civil Aviation?
§ Mr. FrankelDoes the right hon. Gentleman appreciate that as a result of the statement made last Friday, and the statement made by him in answer to supplementary questions, great disappointment is felt by many Members this morning that there is to be no Debate next week on the Government's failure in housing?
§ Mr. EdenThe right hon. Gentleman asked last Friday for a Debate, and certainly it is our intention to have one soon. There are a number of Supply Days coming. I was proposing to arrange for a housing Debate then.
§ Mr. BowlesIs it proposed to publish the White Paper on Civil Aviation before next Tuesday's Debate?
§ Mr. EdenI am afraid I have not the necessary knowledge. Perhaps the hon. Gentleman will let me look into that.
§ Rear-Admiral BeamishWill my right hon. Friend say how and when the Committee stage of the Water Bill is to be taken, and whether it will be affected by any prospective change in the hours of Sitting of the House?
§ Mr. EdenYes, Sir. It is our intention that the Bin should be taken by one of the Standing Committees which we are setting up as a result of the proposed change of hours of Sitting.
§ Captain CobbIs my right hon. Friend aware there is a Motion on the Paper calling attention to the need for a Housing 1567 policy to be initiated; and do the Government propose to give a day for a discussion on that subject?
§ [That this House views with concern the failure of the Government to announce a definite programme of house building, and calls for the use of all possible measures to speed up the provision both of temporary and permanent dwellings.]
§ Mr. EdenPerhaps my hon. and gallant Friend did not hear what I said in reply to a question earlier, that we were proposing to arrange for an early housing Debate.
Miss RathboneHas the right hon. Gentleman considered whether Thursday's arrangements will give sufficient time to take not only the second Reading of the Family Allowances Bill, but also the Financial Resolution? Might not that be very hurried?
§ Mr. EdenI had thought of that. It might be necessary to suspend the Rule, and give a little extra time that day. If so, we are prepared to do that.
§ Mr. GallacherHas the right hon. Gentleman discovered anything about the Education (Scotland) Bill?
§ Mr. EdenI am afraid the state of my knowledge about that matter is somewhat stationary. The Bill is still being worked on.
§ Dr. Haden GuestCan the right hon. Gentleman amplify the reply he gave to the Noble Lord the Member for Horsham and Worthing (Earl Winterton) about a Debate on the subject of economic conditions in Europe? Will such a Debate be announced next week for an early date, and will the Debate be in such a form as to allow consideration of a very wide range of subjects relating to economic conditions?
§ Mr. EdenI said I hoped to make an announcement next Thursday. What I had in mind was that a Debate would take place the following week, and obviously it is desirable that it should be wide.
§ Mr. R. C. MorrisonIt would be for the convenience of the House if the right hon. Gentleman could say whether, in the event of the House deciding to alter its hours of Sitting, it is proposed to set 1568 up Standing Committees during that week. I understand the date of the alteration is to be 13th March. Is it proposed then that the Standing Committees shall hold their first meetings during that week, or will any time elapse?
§ Mr. EdenThe hon. Member will be aware from his long experience it is not a matter which I could decide. That is a matter for the Committees themselves.
§ Mr. BuchananNext Thursday the Leader of the House proposes to take the Family Allowances Bill. Before that, we are to discuss the Motion regarding the Sittings of the House. I cannot see the House disposing of that without taking some considerable time; there is bound to be a good deal of feeling in the House about it. To add, say, an hour to the length of the day's Sitting is not quite a fair way of proceeding. Will he not consider taking this Motion relating to the Sittings of the House on another day, so as to give us some more time in which to discuss this very important Bill?
§ Mr. EdenI would like to consider that, but I must get the Motion one day next week, and Tuesday and Wednesday are already very full days as it is. [An HON. MEMBER: "Friday?"] I have doubts about that. I would like to consider the matter further, and if there is any change in that matter, I will announce it on Tuesday.
§ Colonel Sir Charles MacAndrewWill my right hon. Friend correct a misunderstanding? He led the House to believe that the first meeting of a Standing Committee was fixed by the Committee. It is the undoubted and established right of the Chairman who is appointed to a Standing Committee for the consideration of a particular Bill to name the day and hour on which consideration of the Bill will begin.
§ Mr. EdenI beg my hon. and gallant Friend's pardon. What I meant to say was that it was not my responsibility. It is, of course, a matter for the Chairman of the Committee.
Mr. McNeilWill the right hon. Gentleman reconsider his apparent decision to fob off Scottish Members with an Adjournment Debate on Prestwick Aerodrome? It is a usual method of side-tracking a subject. Will he not reconsider the matter and give the subject a full day?
§ Mr. EdenI do not think the House felt that I was trying to fob off Scottish Members. What I was trying to do was to provide an early opportunity, and it is of course a fairly early one.
§ Mr. GuyWith regard to Wednesday's main Debate, as a large number of Members will wish to take part, will the right hon. Gentleman extend the time?
§ Mr. EdenI would like notice of that. I have not received any representations. We shall have to see how we get on.