§ Mr. Arthur Greenwood
May I ask the Leader of the House if he will state the Business for next week?
§ Tuesday—It is proposed to move Mr. SPEAKER out of the Chair on going into Committee of Supply on the Air Estimates, 1945, and to consider Votes A and 1, and Air Supplementary Estimate, 1944, in Committee.1563
§ Wednesday—It is proposed to move Mr. SPEAKER out of the Chair on going into Committee of Supply on the Navy Estimates, 1945, and to consider Votes A and 1, and Navy Supplementary Estimate, 1944, in Committee.
§ Friday—The Chairman of Ways and Means will propose a Motion to approve the Report from the Select Committee on Private Bill Standing Orders; Committee stage of outstanding Supplementary Estimates contained in House of Commons Paper No. 36.
§ On Thursday, at the beginning of the Business, it will be necessary for us to consider the Motion to alter the present Hours of Sitting.
§ Also during the week, and not later than Friday, it will be necessary for us to ask the House to approve the Electoral Registration Regulations, 1945.
§ Sir Percy Harris
May I ask the Leader of the House whether, if he is going to ask the House to meet on Fridays, he could provide more subjects to occupy our time? On two Fridays recently the Adjournment was reached quite early, and it wants no imagination to see that next Friday's Business will not provide a full day.
§ Earl Winterton
May I ask whether the request made by me on two occasions, supported by my right hon. Friend the Member for East Edinburgh (Mr. Pethick-Lawrence) and other Members, for a Debate on the economic condition of Europe is likely to be granted in the comparatively near future, in view of the fact that there has been a Debate in another place, and that there is a growing public interest in the matter?
Mr. Graham White
Could my right hon. Friend say whether it is the intention of the Government to take the Family Allowances Bill in Committee of the Whole House?
§ Mr. Shinwell
In view of the disaster that has overtaken the Government in the reported resignation of the Parliamentary Secretary to the Ministry of Town and Country Planning, can my right hon. Friend now state the Government's intentions?
§ Mr. Godfrey Nicholson
Will my right hon. Friend draw the attention of his colleagues to the undesirability of making statements on really important subjects, without the slightest notice, on Friday mornings? Last Friday an important statement was made; nobody in the House, so far as I know, had the slightest warning that it was to be made, and many Members who are very interested in the question had not the opportunity of being present.
§ Mr. Eden
I am sure my hon. Friend will bear in mind that Friday is a Parliamentary day, like any other day. However, I quite understand the circumstances; I think we must bear them in mind, but I do not think we should say that Friday should be treated differently from other days. I would like to consider what my hon. Friend has said.
§ Mr. Nicholson
Surely it is highly undesirable for important statements to be made on a day when there are no Questions. On other days, there are inspired Questions, or Private Notice Questions, which give some warning that a matter will be brought up. On a Friday, such a statement comes "out of the blue."
§ Mr. A. Bevan
May I also point out that not only axe there no Questions on Friday, and therefore making use of this opportunity is, to some extent, an abuse of the clemency of Mr. Speaker, but furthermore, Friday does happen to come after Thursday, and there is thus no opportunity of asking that arrangements be 1565 made for a Debate during the succeeding week, after important announcements of that sort. The Government therefore hope that about ten days will elapse, allowing for public opinion to cool after they have launched these torpedoes.
§ Mr. Eden
The hon. Gentleman really must not make these imputations. It is not an attempt to trick the House. If there is a desire for a Debate after a statement on Friday, a statement can be made the following Tuesday. We never attempt tricks of that sort. Further, if I may say so, it has nothing to do with the clemency of the Chair; it has to do with Standing Orders, and Ministers are perfectly entitled to make these statements. At the same time, I do understand the point of view concerning the convenience of Members. There is something in that point, and I would like to consider it, if I may.
§ Mr. Buchanan
May I repeat a Question I put to the Leader of the House last week, regarding the Motion which certain Scottish Members have put down about Prestwick Aerodrome, and ask him whether he can give us any hope that there will be a Debate for Scottish Members, on that issue?
§ [That, in the opinion of this House, it is in the interests of civil aviation that Prestwick airport, which has throughout the war become Britain's main transoceanic airport, should continue as the principal international airport for the United Kingdom until a new airport has been completed in the London area, and should thereafter be maintained as second only in importance to the new London 1566 airport; and that immediate encouragement should be given to the conversion, production, assembly and operation of aircraft in Scotland.]
Dr. Russell Thomas
Can my right hon. Friend say whether, and if so when, the Government propose to bring in legislation in regard to the new Ministry for Civil Aviation?
§ Mr. Frankel
Does the right hon. Gentleman appreciate that as a result of the statement made last Friday, and the statement made by him in answer to supplementary questions, great disappointment is felt by many Members this morning that there is to be no Debate next week on the Government's failure in housing?
§ Mr. Bowles
Is it proposed to publish the White Paper on Civil Aviation before next Tuesday's Debate?
§ Rear-Admiral Beamish
Will my right hon. Friend say how and when the Committee stage of the Water Bill is to be taken, and whether it will be affected by any prospective change in the hours of Sitting of the House?
§ Captain Cobb
Is my right hon. Friend aware there is a Motion on the Paper calling attention to the need for a Housing 1567 policy to be initiated; and do the Government propose to give a day for a discussion on that subject?
§ [That this House views with concern the failure of the Government to announce a definite programme of house building, and calls for the use of all possible measures to speed up the provision both of temporary and permanent dwellings.]
Has the right hon. Gentleman considered whether Thursday's arrangements will give sufficient time to take not only the second Reading of the Family Allowances Bill, but also the Financial Resolution? Might not that be very hurried?
§ Mr. Gallacher
Has the right hon. Gentleman discovered anything about the Education (Scotland) Bill?
§ Dr. Haden Guest
Can the right hon. Gentleman amplify the reply he gave to the Noble Lord the Member for Horsham and Worthing (Earl Winterton) about a Debate on the subject of economic conditions in Europe? Will such a Debate be announced next week for an early date, and will the Debate be in such a form as to allow consideration of a very wide range of subjects relating to economic conditions?
§ Mr. R. C. Morrison
It would be for the convenience of the House if the right hon. Gentleman could say whether, in the event of the House deciding to alter its hours of Sitting, it is proposed to set 1568 up Standing Committees during that week. I understand the date of the alteration is to be 13th March. Is it proposed then that the Standing Committees shall hold their first meetings during that week, or will any time elapse?
§ Mr. Buchanan
Next Thursday the Leader of the House proposes to take the Family Allowances Bill. Before that, we are to discuss the Motion regarding the Sittings of the House. I cannot see the House disposing of that without taking some considerable time; there is bound to be a good deal of feeling in the House about it. To add, say, an hour to the length of the day's Sitting is not quite a fair way of proceeding. Will he not consider taking this Motion relating to the Sittings of the House on another day, so as to give us some more time in which to discuss this very important Bill?
§ Mr. Eden
I would like to consider that, but I must get the Motion one day next week, and Tuesday and Wednesday are already very full days as it is. [An HON. MEMBER: "Friday?"] I have doubts about that. I would like to consider the matter further, and if there is any change in that matter, I will announce it on Tuesday.
§ Colonel Sir Charles MacAndrew
Will my right hon. Friend correct a misunderstanding? He led the House to believe that the first meeting of a Standing Committee was fixed by the Committee. It is the undoubted and established right of the Chairman who is appointed to a Standing Committee for the consideration of a particular Bill to name the day and hour on which consideration of the Bill will begin.
Will the right hon. Gentleman reconsider his apparent decision to fob off Scottish Members with an Adjournment Debate on Prestwick Aerodrome? It is a usual method of side-tracking a subject. Will he not reconsider the matter and give the subject a full day?