§ 38. Major C. S. Taylorasked the Secretary of State for War whether he is aware that a claim has been submitted by the rural district council for repayment of expenditure on work, at a place of which he has been informed, made necessary by work executed under the Defence Regulations; and why the claim is not admitted by his Department.
§ Sir J. GriggThe defence works were not constructed on the site of the sewage pumping station and no damage was caused to that property. Denial or obstruction of access does not in itself create any entitlement to compensation under the Compensation (Defence) Act, and I am advised that no claim lies in this case.
§ Major TaylorIn view of the fact that it is admitted that this work would not have been necessary had it not been for the defence works erected by the War Department, surely the War Department must be liable for this claim?
§ Sir J. GriggLawyers tell me that I am not.
§ Major TaylorIn view of the impossibility of pursuing this matter by question and answer, I give notice that I will raise it on the Adjournment at the first opportunity.