§ 20. Major C. S. Taylorasked the Secretary of State for War whether he has any statement to make about the damage to a private residence, the name of which he has been informed, caused by anti-tank guns; and whether he is satisfied that there was no deliberate destruction or carelessness on the part of the troops concerned.
Sir J. GriģģThis private residence is in the danger area of an anti-tank range used for firing at quickly moving targets. It is liable to be damaged by ricochets and it has therefore been requisitioned. The compensation due will be paid when the requisition is relinquished. As regards the last part of the Question I have no reason to believe that there has been deliberate destruction or carelessness on the part of the troops.
§ Major TaylorAs this residence is the only residence in an enormous area of 637 downland, would my right hon. Friend hold an inquiry to see whether there has been negligence or carelessness?
Sir J. GriģģI have inquired into it, and I do not see that there is any reason to suppose that a formal inquiry will add anything to the information I already have.
§ Mr. QuibellIt is by no means a rare case.
§ Major TaylorIn view of the reply I beg to give notice that I will raise the matter on the Adjournment.