HC Deb 13 December 1944 vol 406 cc1217-8
28. Mr. De Chair

asked the First Lord of the Admiralty why, when officers and other ranks in the Service are invalided out of the Royal Navy as a result of wounds, no mention is made in the letter notifying the person of his discharge that it is a result of wounds received in action; and whether he is aware of the dissatisfaction felt among those invalided out as a result of wounds that the reason is defined as ill-health.

Mr. Alexander

No, Sir, the Admiralty Letter sent to officers invalided from the Royal Navy as the result of wounds does not state that they are being invalided on account of ill-health. It informs them of the result of the medical survey on the question of their fitness for further Naval service. Any officer receiving wounds will have been issued with a Hurt Certificate which he can produce, should it be necessary for him after leaving the Ser- vice to certify this fact. It is not considered appropriate that the invaliding letter referred to should be substituted for this certificate. Ratings invalided for wounds not only receive a Hurt Certificate, but have a notation of the wound made on the Service Certificate—K.R. 606 (2).

Forward to