§ 66. Sir W. Smithersasked the Secretary of State for the Home Department why the enquiry into remand homes is not being held in public; and if he will arrange that it shall be and that evidence be taken on oath.
§ Mr. H. MorrisonOn the first point, I would refer my hon. Friend to the reply which I made to my hon. Friend the Member for Twickenham (Mr. Keeling) on 28th November. In order to enable the evidence to be taken on oath, it would have been necessary to have recourse to the Tribunals of Inquiry (Evidence) Act, 1921, but procedure under this Act is quite exceptional and in the present case it was deemed sufficient to adopt the usual procedure which is recognised to produce excellent results.
§ Sir W. SmithersIs the right hon. Gentleman not aware that the setting up of these secret inquiries is further evidence of the way that he is leading the country down the totalitarian road?
§ Colonel GreenwellAre shorthand notes being taken of the proceedings of the inquiry?
§ Mr. MorrisonI think there is a Question on the Paper on that point.
§ 76. Mr. Molsonasked the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether 728 he is now prepared to undertake that the evidence given before the Committee of Inquiry into Remand Homes will be published as a supplement to the Report.
§ Mr. H. MorrisonEven before the warthe general practice was against the publication in full of evidence given before committees, since it is the duty of a committee to include in its report a fair and adequate review of the evidence given and of the reasons for its conclusions and recommendations. In war time the arguments against publication are even more cogent. The report of the inquiry, which will be searching and comprehensive, will be published in full, and there is no sufficient reason for departing from the usual practice on the present occasion.
§ Mr. MolsonIn view of the widespread impression that the Home Secretary is anxious to hush this matter up, will he make the evidence available in the Library?
§ Mr. MorrisonI will consider that point, but, if I may say so, there is far too much tendency to bring party politics into this matter. There is none in my mind, and I hope that hon. Members will be restrained about that aspect of the matter.
§ Mr. SilkinIs my right hon. Friend aware that no one would be more pleased than the London County Council that the evidence should be published in full?
§ Mr. MorrisonI will take note of that observation.
§ Mr. Kenneth LindsayFor the sake of the children, will my right hon. Friend see that no daily reports are published until the official report is ready?
§ Mr. MorrisonThat is what I have done, and what I am criticised for. I entirely agree with my hon. Friend.