§ 5. Mr. Stokesasked the Minister of Labour whether women working in N.A.A.F.I. canteens in camps situated remote from towns are directed to their work so as to ensure adequate service for the soldiers in such camps?
§ Mr. BevinDirections have not been necessary, as there are sufficient volunteers to maintain the maximum strength which has been authorised for this service. The distribution of workers within this 905 maximum is for the N.A.A.F.I, authorities, in accordance with the general policy of the Services, and I understand that the importance of giving adequate service in isolated stations is fully borne in mind.
§ Mr. StokesIf I send the Minister particulars of one case, will he have it looked into?
§ Mr. StokesIs it possible to arrange, in a remote area where women will not go as assistants, for members of the A.T.S. to do the work?
§ Mr. BevinI cannot be a party to allowing members of the A.T.S. to be used in N.A.A.F.I. canteens. That would upset the allocation. I have to keep a very strict watch on what they do with the A.T.S., or they will be substituting them in services which they have promised to cut in other directions.