§ . Mr. Francis Wattasked the President of the Board of Trade whether he is 1189 aware that the imposition of a maximum price of 245. 5d. by Section 5 (2) of the Toys and Indoor Games (Maximum Prices and Records) Order, 1943, has caused hardship to many shopkeepers who have stocks of toys the cost price of which exceeds 24s. 5d.; and what steps does he propose to remedy this matter?
§ Mr. DaltonNo, Sir. This Order was made on 22nd April, but, in respect of retailers' prices, it did not become effective until 1st October, allowing a reasonable time for retailers to dispose of their stocks of high-priced toys. The Chairman of the Central Price Regulation Committee discussed the possibility of retailers holding stocks of the toys referred to with representatives of the trade in July and August of this year, and asked to be furnished with early information as to whether any hardship was likely to arise. I am informed that no representations have been made to him in reply to his request.
§ Major PetherickDid discussions proceed with the trade before the Order was introduced? Is it not a fact that the six months' period given to retailers to dispose of their stocks were the six bad months of the year, and did not include Christmas?
§ Mr. DaltonThey deliberately did not include the Christmas trade, because the whole purpose of the Order is that Christmas toys should be cheap.
§ Mr. WattIs it not a fact that the six months were of very little use to the trade? Will the right hon. Gentleman be willing to receive representations, and to look further into this matter?
§ Mr. DaltonI am always glad to receive representations, but most of the representations I have received on this subject have been that I should endeavour to cheapen the price of toys for Christmas time, which is the purpose of the Order.