HC Deb 20 May 1942 vol 380 cc223-4
35. Mr. Banfield

asked the Secretary of State for War whether he is aware that the present allowance for plain clothes made to men on their discharge from the Army is totally inadequate under the prices ruling to-day; and will he look into the matter, with a view to removing what is felt by the men concerned as a legitimate grievance and injustice?

The Financial Secretary to the War Office (Mr. Sandys)

A man discharged from the Army normally retains a pair of boots and the socks, shirts and underclothes already issued to him. In addition he receives an issue in kind of a civilian suit, cap and tie. However, should he prefer it, he is given an allowance in cash, based on the cost to the Department of these articles of civilian clothing.

Mr. Banfield

Is the hon. Gentleman aware that the sum of £2 2s. 8d. is ridiculously inadequate, and is he further aware that the men feel very strongly that this is adding insult to injury?

Mr. Sandys

I think I made it clear to the hon. Member in my answer that the cash payment is optional and is based on the cost of the articles of civilian clothing to the Department. In all cases, the issue in kind is available, and it is up to the man to decide whether he would prefer to have the articles or the cash allowance.

Mr. Banfield

But is the hon. Gentleman not aware that at times civilian clothing is not available, and that men are told they cannot have a suit but must have the cash?

Mr. Sandys

I know of no such cases.

Mr. Banfield

But they occur.