HC Deb 13 June 1940 vol 361 c1364
20. Mr. Cocks

asked the Home Secretary whether his attention has been called to the fact that papers found on German parachutists in Holland contained lists of people who were to be shot on sight; and whether, seeing that in the event of an invasion, Members of Parliament falling into enemy hands would probably be the first to be killed, he will consider issuing revolvers or other weapons to Members in order that they may be in a position to sell their lives as dearly as possible?

Sir J. Anderson

While I appreciate my hon. Friend's point of view, I am afraid there would be many objections to such a proposal, including the objection that a distinction could not properly be drawn in this respect between Members of Parliament and many other civilians.

Mr. Cocks

Is the right hon. Gentleman aware that in such circumstances Ministers would be protected by an armed guard, whereas back-benchers would be shot? Will he not, therefore, consider either doing what I suggest or releasing arms to those Members willing to pay for them?

Sir Joseph Lamb

Might not the explanation of the difference in the position between Ministers and back-benchers be that Ministers might require further protection?

Sir J. Anderson

I do not think that these matters can, with advantage, be discussed further on this occasion.

Commander Locker-Lampson

May we carry revolvers if we possess them?

Mr. Cocks

If a Member of Parliament meets a parachutist, is he not entitled to a Supplementary Question?