HC Deb 04 April 1940 vol 359 cc296-7
19. Mr. Sloan

asked the Minister of Labour whether he is aware that William Ross, who was a Parliamentary candidate in the recent by-election at Kettering, has been dismissed by his employers, Messrs. Stewarts and Lloyds; that this dismissal has created serious discontent amongst the workers at Corby; and whether it is his intention to intervene with a view to having Mr. Ross reinstated?

Mr. E. Brown

I understand that the matter to which the hon. Member refers has been discussed in accordance with the constitutional arrangements in the industry. In the circumstances I do not think there is any action I can usefully take.

Mr. Sloan

Is the Minister aware that the offence complained of here is merely technical and is not uncommon in all large industries; and as this man was a candidate for Parliament during his absence from work, is the Minister prepared to take steps to prove that there is no political victimisation by an endeavour to deprive this man of his employment?

Mr. Brown

I thought my answer would have shown that. I have pointed out that my information is that this matter has been discussed through the proper constitutional machinery and in the light of the information which I have received, I do not think there is any action which I can usefully take.

Mr. Gallacher

Is the Minister not aware that this man wrote to the firm immediately he was nominated, and explained the reason for his absence?

Mr. Brown

I do not think that is so. My information is that he and another man absented themselves from work without having applied for or obtained permission.

Mr. Sloan

Even if the man is prepared to admit that he was in error, are we to understand from the Minister's answer that his dismissal is to be definite and that he is no longer to be allowed to work, because he became a candidate for Parliament?

Mr. Brown

That is not the issue.

Mr. Sloan

I give notice that I shall raise this matter on the Motion for the Adjournment.