§ 2. Mr. Gallacherasked the Minister of Labour whether he is aware that when Mr. H. Burnstone, of Otchard Place, 486 Southampton, was recently sent to an Army rest camp from the Southampton Employment Exchange, he was offered employment at 52s. 6d. per week, whereas his possession of a Board of Trade ticket entitles him to the Maritime Board rate of £13 2s. 6d. per month; that, when he refused this offer, he was turned off benefit, although later this was reversed owing to the intervention of the man's trade union; and whether he will see that men are not penalised for refusing jobs in camps, and other military establishments, at rates less than their normal trade union rates?
§ Mr. E. BrownIf, as I presume, this worker's name is H. Bernstein, my information is that although he failed to start at this job after accepting it, his unemployment benefit was neither stopped nor suspended.
§ Mr. GallacherAs complaint has been made by this man and similar complaints are being made by others, will the Minister take steps to ensure that this does not happen?
§ 3. Mr. W. Whiteleyasked the Minister of Labour whether he will consider the hardships arising by the operation of the waiting days in the payment of unemployment benefit, having regard to the fact that many collieries are laid idle for one or two days due to shipping and transport difficulties?
§ Mr. BrownThe hon. Member will remember that I discussed this question recently with him and one of his colleagues, and that they promised to put the case to me in writing, with a full statement of the reasons for suggesting the change. I have not yet received this statement.
§ Mr. WhiteleyIs the right hon. Gentleman aware that there have been discussions between the Durham coal owners and the Durham miners, and that they are themselves agreed that this is a very beneficial thing?
§ Mr. BrownThey know that as far as benefit is concerned the matter will have to be considered by the committee.
§ Mr. ShinwellWhen men are forced out of employment by Government action is there not a case for full consideration?
§ Mr. Georģe GriffithsIs it not a fact that upstairs not long ago the Minister bitterly opposed this reconsideration, and turned it down?