HC Deb 11 July 1939 vol 349 cc2063-4
75. Mr. Ritson

asked the Secretary of State for War whether he is aware that the contractors who are responsible for a large development under his Department, near Durham, are compelling men to work 80 hours per week while hundreds of men who have been unemployed for long periods cannot have their claims for work considered; whether these conditions are in accordance with the Fair Wages Clause, and what he proposes to do about it?

Mr. Hore-Belisha

I am informed that 62 hours a week is the maximum, and that the great majority of the men are working only three or four hours' overtime a week. The service is urgent, and the number of men employed on the site is the most that can be employed without overcrowding. No pressure has been brought to bear on the men to work overtime, and I am advised that there is no departure from the Fair Wages Clause.

Mr. Ritson

Is the right hon. Gentleman aware that I have visited this place myself, and that every word in the question is corroborated by the men there? Is he aware, too, that deputations from the Legion and from trade union bodies have been to me again, and confirmed what I have stated in the question? Does he think that these conditions are fair, and will he blacklist the firm in respect of the next contract taken up? Further, is he aware that only vigorous young men are employed there, and that thousands are waiting to get in?

Mr. Hore-Belisha

There appears to be some difference of opinion. The hon. Member asked me whether these men are being compelled to work 80 hours per week, and I am informed that that is not the case. I am further informed by my right hon. Friend the Minister of Labour that the contractor has fully observed the clause in his contract relating to fair wages conditions.

Mr. Batey

The Minister says that these men are working 62 hours a week, and is that fair in a district where there are so many unemployed? There is no justification for men working 62 hours per week in Durham.

Mr. Hore-Belisha

I gave the reason for that; but, at any rate, 62 hours is very different from 80 hours.

Mr. Stephen

Will the right hon. Gentle man ask the Minister of Labour to make further inquiry in view of the statements of the right hon. Member?

Mr. Hore-Belisha

I have given an answer to the hon. Member that shows that his information is contested, and it would be the duty of the hon. Gentleman to provide me with some counteracting evidence. If he does so, of course, I will make inquiry and revise the information that I have received.