HC Deb 07 February 1939 vol 343 cc726-7
20. Sir Thomas Rosbotham

asked the Secretary for Mines whether he is aware that the White Moss Coal Company, Limited, Upholland, have disposed of their supply sales quota to the Sutton Manor Collieries, Limited, and, as the result, several hundred men will be thrown out of work; and what steps he is taking to prevent such transactions taking place in a Special Area?

The Secretary for Mines (Captain Crookshank)

I am aware that the Sutton Manor Collieries have purchased the supply basic tonnage of the White Moss Coal Company, Limited, but since this transaction will enable the Sutton Manor Collieries to expand their output, it does not follow, as my hon. Friend suggests, that several hundred men will be thrown out of work. The White Moss Company have in fact stated publicly that one of the pits comprised in their undertaking has been acquired also, and will continue to be worked by the Sutton Manor Collieries, and I am informed by the company that the majority of the men who will be displaced by the closing down of their other pit at Upholland will be found work at Sutton Manor as soon as developments there permit. I am not prepared to take steps to prevent the sale of supply basic tonnages. Such sales are essential in cases where steps are being taken to concentrate output in the more efficient colliery undertakings.

Mr. Tinker

Is the right hon. and gallant Gentleman aware that in this case it will mean the closing down of a colliery and will put several hundred men out of work? Will he make an appeal to the coalowners to consult with him before they deal with these quotas, because it means closing down collieries, and advise them on the course that they ought to take? Surely some steps ought to be taken by his Department in matters of this kind.

Captain Crookshank

I have said that my information is that the majority of the men who will be displaced will be found work again.

Mr. Tinker

That is a tale. It will not happen.

Mr. A. V. Alexander

Is the Minister satisfied that this will not mean the reduction of reserves of domestic supplies? That has happened previously.

Mr. R. J. Taylor

Does the Minister appreciate that while 51 per cent. will be employed, there may be 49 per cent. unemployed?

Mr. H. G. Williams

Is not this act a sequel to the Coal Mines Act, 1930, which was promoted by the party opposite?