HC Deb 05 May 1938 vol 335 cc1015-6
34. Mr. Hollins

asked the Home Secretary whether he is aware that the effect of lead poisoning may not become evident until some years after a worker, who has been employed in a lead process, has left his occupation; and whether he will consider extending the period in which a claim for compensation can be made after a worker has ceased to be employed in a lead process from one year to at least five years or to eliminate the time limit?

Sir S. Hoare

The point will be noted for consideration when an opportunity occurs for amending legislation, and if the hon. Member will send me particulars of any cases he has in mind I shall be glad to consider them.

Mr. Hollins

Can the right hon. Gentleman say why there should be any distinction between the three years' limit for silicosis and lead poisoning? Why not bring in legislation?

Sir S. Hoare

I prefer not to deal with a technical question of that kind unless it is on the Order Paper. As far as legislation is concerned, I have already informed the House that there is no likelihood of our being able to deal with this question this Session.

Mr. J. Griffiths

Is it not a fact that expert opinion with regard to these diseases is that this distinction should be removed?

Viscountess Astor

Is it not the fact that for years hon. Members on all sides of the House have urged the Government to take drastic action?