§ 46. Mr. Mathersasked the Minister for the Co-ordination of Defence, whether he is aware of the apprehension caused by the removal of Royal Air Force units from Turnhouse and Donibristle stations; and whether he is satisfied that the defence of the area involved is not thereby affected detrimentally?
§ Sir T. InskipI would refer the hon. Member to the answer to a similar question which was given on my behalf on 20th December, 1937, by my right hon. Friend the Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasury. I should perhaps point out that the squadrons being moved from Turnhouse and Donibristle are bomber squadrons, and were never intended for the purposes of direct defence.
§ Mr. MathersIs not the right hon. Gentleman aware that the reply which was given did not allay the apprehension in the area? May we understand that, in establishing defence air services in the area, Turnhouse and Donibristle will be used for those defence services, and that the people whose services are being dispensed with will be employed?
§ Sir T. InskipThe area in which Turn-house and Donibristle are is, of course, included in the general defences of the whole country.
§ Mr. MathersIn view of the replies which the right hon. Gentleman has given me, will he take into consideration the provision of some information so that the reliable newspapers in the area will be able to allay the public apprehension—not necessarily giving details, but giving such information as can be used discreetly for the reassurance of public opinion?