HC Deb 24 November 1937 vol 329 cc1214-7
46. Mr. Thurtle

asked the Prime Minister whether he is in a position to make any statement regarding the conversations which have taken place between Lord Halifax and Herr Hitler, and other representatives of the German Government?

The Prime Minister

As my right hon. Friend the Chancellor of the Exchequer informed the House on 12th November, the visit of the Lord President of the Council was entirely private and unofficial. It had, however, as the House is aware, been arranged that Lord Halifax should see Herr Hitler, which he accordingly did on 19th November at Berchtesgaden, being accompanied by Baron Von Neurath, the German Foreign Minister. During his visit, the Lord President also had the opportunity of meeting General Goering, Dr. Goebbels, and other prominent leaders in Germany. These conversations were of a confidential character, and the House will not, I am sure, expect me to make any further statement in regard to them at this stage. I am satisfied, however, that the visit has been valuable in furthering the desire, which I believe to be generally felt in both countries, for the establishment of closer mutual understanding.

Miss Horsbrugh

Is the Prime Minister aware that speculations on these conversations have appeared in the morning Press?

The Prime Minister

Yes, Sir, and I should like to make it clear that these statements are not only irresponsible but highly inaccurate.

Mr. Attlee

Can the right hon. Gentleman say whether, as a result of an agree- ment with the German Government, no details can be given of the nature of these discussions?

The Prime Minister

There was no formal agreement, but it was understood that the conversations should remain confidential.

Mr. Mander

Can the right hon. Gentleman give an assurance that there is no foundation for the statement that the Government are considering giving Germany a free hand in Austria and Czechoslovakia, in exchange for no demand for colonies for six years?

Hon. Members

Order!

Mr. Mander

On a point of Order. I desired to put a question of great importance, and I was prevented by some Members on the other side of the House from even getting to the end of it. I venture to submit that it is a perfectly orderly and proper question in the public interest, and I would ask you, Sir, to be good enough to consider whether the Prime Minister may not reply to it.

Mr. Speaker

It would certainly not be allowed on the Paper, if a question were asked as to whether a report was true. One does not know from where the report emanates.

Mr. A. Henderson

May I ask the Prime Minister, first, whether, in fact, any pledges have been given and, secondly, whether, in any event, the French Government have been kept fully informed as to what is taking place?

The Prime Minister

No, Sir. No pledges have been given. As regards the second part of the question, the French Government have naturally not been informed yet of the result of the conversations—

Mr. Gallacher

Then there has been a result?

The Prime Minister

—but a question is to be put to me later on about the forthcoming visit of French Ministers when it is hoped full information will be given them.

Mr. Attlee

May we take it that no commitments of any kind on behalf of this country will be made without the House having full opportunity of discussion?

Mr. Chamberlain

Of course.

Mr. Gallacher

Will it not be too late?

Mr. Mander

On a point of Order. Owing to the unsatisfactory nature of the reply, I beg to give notice that I shall raise the matter at the earliest opportunity.