§ 73. Mr. Sorensenasked the Home Secretary whether he is aware that Victor Punshon, of 125, Church Road, Leyton, was charged with theft at Stratford Police Court, on Friday, 12th February, and that the bench decided there was insufficient evidence to convict; whether he has examined the unsatisfactory nature of the evidence against him; whether he is aware that five witnesses are prepared to testify that the accused was engaged at his father's shop during the time of the alleged offence; and whether, in view of the legal expenses in which this man and his father were involved, he will see that the innocent man receives adequate compensation?
§ Mr. LloydInquiries have been made about this case, and I understand an application was made to the Court on behalf of the defendant for costs and the application was refused. It does not appear to be a case for any action by the Home Secretary.
§ Mr. SorensenIs the hon. Gentleman aware that this is the second case of the kind which has occurred in my constituency within the last few weeks: is he further aware that this particular accused person left the court, in the words of the bench, "without a stain on his character"; and as the man has been involved in an expenditure of some £15 to £20 is it not desirable that some compensation should be given to him?
§ Mr. LloydI do not think it is a general rule that persons who have been acquitted should have their expenses paid from public funds.
§ Mr. SorensenSurely the hon. Member must realise that we want it to be appreciated that justice is done in this country, and that it will not be appreciated if some compensation is not paid.