HC Deb 23 June 1937 vol 325 c1189
54. Mr. Rowson

asked the Minister of Transport whether he is aware of the widespread indignation and dissatisfaction among the people in the Borough of Morecambe, Lancashire, at the action of the North Western Traffic Commissioners in refusing to hear the representatives of over 2,000 petitioners who wished to state a case against a projected co-ordination scheme between the corporation and Ribble Motor Services, Limited; and will he take action through his Department to prevent any decision of the commissioners from taking effect until a full public inquiry has taken place at which the evidence of the said petitioners has been heard?

Mr. Burgin

This matter had not previously been brought to my notice. Subject to the provisions of Section 72 of the Road Traffic Act, 1930, the hearing of representations on applications for road service licences is entirely within the discretion of the traffic commissioners.

Mr. Rowson

In view of the fact that the trade union representative was denied a hearing on behalf of the people of Morecambe, who wanted their case put, will the Minister answer the last part of the question which is, whether, seeing that there is so much dissatisfaction, he will prevent the decision of the Commissioners being implemented until the petition has been heard?

Mr. Burgin

We must bear in mind the terms of the Act of Parliament. It may he that an appeal will come up in this matter and that I shall have to be the judge. I would, therefore, rather look into the matter further. I would call the hon. Gentleman's attention to the Section referred to in my reply.

Mr. Rowson

Is it not a fact that the trade unions have a right under the Act to present their case?

Mr. Burgin

That may well be so.