§ 21. Mr. Flemingasked the Minister of Labour whether he has considered the objection submitted to him against his proposal to erect an Employment Exchange adjoining the central branch of the Manchester Royal Infirmary; and whether he still intends to proceed with the said building?
§ 22. Mr. Ellis Smithasked the Minister of Labour whether he can now inform the House of the result of his attention to the position that will be created by the erection of the central Employment Exchange in Manchester?
§ 23. Mr. Bennasked the Minister of Labour whether he has reached any decision concerning the erection of an Employment Exchange adjoining the central branch of the Manchester Royal Infirmary; and whether he has observed the very general objection in Manchester to this proposal?
§ 30. Mr. Emeryasked the Minister of Labour whether he is aware that the building of the new Employment Exchange in Manchester adjacent to the central branch of the Manchester Royal Infirmary will cause the closing down of the branch for in-patients; whether he will outline the special reasons for the selection of such a site; and whether, if it is decided to proceed with the scheme, some reasonable part of the cost incurred 1156 by the infirmary authorities for removal or alteration of the branch will be paid to them?
§ Mr. E. BrownI would refer the hon. Members to the reply given to the hon. Members for the Exchange Division of Manchester (Mr. Eckersley) and for Eccles (Mr. Cary) on this subject on 8th March. I am now in consultation with the First Commissioner of Works regarding certain proposals recently made to me informally on behalf of the board of the Manchester Royal Infirmary, but, until our inquiries are completed, I am unable to make any statement.
§ Mr. FlemingHas the Minister considered the serious objection of the medical profession in Manchester on the ground that this proposed building will very gravely obstruct the work that is being carried on in the central branch of the Royal Infirmary?
§ Mr. BrownI am aware, not only of that objection, but of some others which have been put to me. I am also aware that for 15 years past the great social service of the Employment Exchange in Manchester has been carried on in a building that is utterly unsuitable and not fair to the staff concerned.
§ Mr. BennHas the right hon. Gentleman taken any advice as to the public opinion in Manchester with regard to this matter? If not, will he be good enough to do so?
§ Mr. BrownI am well aware of the opinion in Manchester. At the request of the representative of the Infirmary, I saw him privately, and it is for that reason that I am now doing my best to carry out the promise I made to him that I would get consideration for this matter.
§ Mr. BennThat is not quite what I asked. I asked whether the right hon. Gentleman had been in consultation with representative public opinion in Manchester on the matter, and, if not, whether he would be so good as to get into consultation?
§ Mr. BrownSome time ago I saw a very important body on this matter, and heard all the arguments over again.
§ Mr. E. SmithWould the right hon. Gentleman also consider the alternative 1157 of taking into consultation the Office of Works with a view to taking over the site of the Infirmary and suitably compensating the Manchester Royal Infirmary?
§ Mr. EmeryCan the Minister say whether, if it is possible to proceed with the scheme, some reasonable proportion of the additional cost incurred by the hospital authorities in removing the branch will be repaid to them?
§ 61. Mr. E. Smithasked the Minister of Health whether his attention has been directed to the report prepared by the medical board of the Manchester Royal Infirmary with reference to the proposed erection of the central Employment Exchange; and what action does he propose to take?
§ The Minister of Health (Sir Kingsley Wood)I have received representations from the hospital on this proposal, but I have no powers in the matter, which is one for my right hon. Friends the Minister of Labour and the First Commissioner of Works.
§ Mr. SmithIn view of the fact that the Royal Infirmary is a voluntary hospital, will the right hon. Gentleman accept his share of responsibility and cooperate with the Minister of Labour and the First Commissioner of Works with a view of bringing about a satisfactory solution of this question?
§ Sir K. WoodMy right hon. Friend the Minister of Labour has already answered that question.
§ Mr. FlemingCan the right hon. Gentleman tell us whether on receipt of this medical report he made any inquiries in Manchester to see if any medical man agreed with the action of the Minister of Labour?
§ Sir K. WoodAs a matter of fact, when I was in Manchester recently I saw the site, and the officials.
§ Mr. FlemingThat is no reply to my question.