HC Deb 17 March 1936 vol 310 cc217-8
33. Mr. PALING

asked the Secretary of State for Dominion Affairs whether he will recommend His Majesty to disallow the Southern Rhodesia Native Registration Bill, 1936, on the ground, inter alia, that it unduly restricts the freedom of movement of the native population and, in consequence, the possibility of improving their economic position?

Mr. M. MacDONALD

I understand that this Bill has not yet been introduced into the Southern Rhodesia Parliament. It was, however, referred in draft form last year by the Government of Southern Rhodesia to my predecessor, who replied that, since the Bill was to a great extent a consolidation of existing enactments and since the main new principle which it is desired to introduce, namely the establishment of hostels for natives, appeared to be likely to be of advantage both to natives and to Europeans, he had no special observations to offer on the Bill as a whole.

Mr. PALING

Is it the fact that in addition, this Bill restricts the powers of natives almost to move about or to seek work, unless they have a special permit?

Mr. MacDONALD

The whole of that part of the Bill, except for some alteration in detail is a mere re-enactment of legislation which has been in effect for some years.

Mr. PALING

Is it not a fact that it proposes new things for instance, to adopt compulsory vaccination and also provides that natives must have their finger prints taken?

Mr. MacDONALD

I said that there is nothing new, except a few matters of detail, but I shall have to look into these matters before giving an answer.

Mr. PALING

May I take it that the right hon. Gentleman's predecessor and the right hon. Gentleman himself are in favour of these things being done?