§ 47. Mr. WATKINSasked the Prime Minister whether any subsequent improvements in the methods of defence against aerial warfare, or any other circumstances, have falsified his statement in the House on 10th November, 1932, to the effect that there is no effective method of defence against bombing from the air, and that many bombing aeroplanes will always get through?
§ The PRIME MINISTERMethods of combating air attacks are continuously being studied and developed, and valuable progress has been made. It will be readily appreciated that it would not be in the public interest to disclose the lines on which work is proceeding.
§ Mr. SHINWELLAre we to understand that the right hon. Gentleman has modified his previous opinion?
§ The PRIME MINISTERTo answer that would really require a speech in debate.
§ Mr. THURTLEIs it still not true that offence is the best method of defence in aircraft?
§ The PRIME MINISTERThat is a matter much more easily discussed in debate than by question and answer. It is a very difficult and complicated question and, generally speaking, I would rather defer any remarks I have to make till I have an opportunity of making them in debate.
§ Mr. WATKINSIs there any truth in the Press statements now appearing that a so-called invisible curtain has been designed which will render air attacks over this country impossible?
§ The PRIME MINISTERI could not answer that question, but I should advise every Member of the House to accept with great reserve any statement about secret processes which may or may not have been designed.