HC Deb 02 August 1935 vol 304 cc2984-5
6. Duchess of ATHOLL

asked the Minister of Transport whether, in view of the fact that agencies controlling hoardings have recently refused to find space for a political poster because they had been given to understand by a representative of his Department that their position would be prejudiced under the Restriction of Ribbon Development Bill if they exposed posters criticising the Government, he will contradict this intimation and make inquiries into the circumstances under which it was made?

Captain HUDSON

I am not aware of any foundation for the allegation that any such statement was made by any representative of the Department, which indeed hardly requires contradiction from me in view of its fantastic character.

Duchess of ATHOLL

Would the hon. and gallant Gentleman look at the evidence that I have received giving details of the intimations made as to why the poster was refused?

Captain HUDSON

I have in my hand a letter from the bill posters. They have an independent censorship committee of their industry which does not permit posters to be put up which offend against public taste. The reason they would not put up this one is because it was a personal attack on an individual. As regards the Ribbon Development Bill, the Standing Committee passed the Amendment on 15th July, and the censorship committee's action was taken 10 days later.

Duchess of ATHOLL

Does the hon. and gallant Gentleman not know that another Bill is under discussion by private interests which will affect the position of owners of boardings?

Captain HUDSON

All I can say is that the industry itself alludes to this question as a deliberate and disgraceful falsehood.

Mr. LOGAN

Is it not possible to bring these people before the Bar of the House?

Mr. COCKS

Are not the posters issued by the Ministry of Health also of a misleading character?

Captain HUDSON

They do not offend against public taste.

Forward to