HC Deb 07 May 1934 vol 289 c723
49. Sir WILLIAM DAVISON

asked the President of the Board of Trade whether his attention has been drawn to the considerable increase in re-exports from Great Britain to Soviet Russia of rubber and tea; and whether such re-exports will be excluded from the terms of the recent Trade Agreement, as no additional employment is provided in Great Britain by these transactions?

Lieut.-Colonel COLVILLE

The re-exports of rubber to Soviet Russia have only increased slightly during the first quarter of this year as compared with a year ago, and the re-exports of tea have been considerably less during the quarter than in the corresponding quarter of 1933. The answer to the second part of the question is in the negative.

Sir W. DAVISON

Was not the House informed that one of the principal objects of the Trade Agreement was to give increased employment in this country; and how can the mere re-export and transhipment of goods in this country give employment to British workers?

Lieut.-Colonel COLVILLE

It does give employment; but, as I have pointed out, the re-export of tea has been considerably less since the agreement.

Sir W. DAVISON

Even if that is so, has it anything to do with the question? The object of the new Agreement was to give additional employment. Does the re-export of tea and rubber give employment in this country?

Lieut.-Colonel COLVILLE

Yes, Sir; but my hon. Friend asked me to deal with the question of a considerable increase, and in fact there is rather a decrease in the case of tea.