HC Deb 07 March 1933 vol 275 cc991-2
39. Mr. BATEY

asked the Home Secretary what communications have passed between his Department and the Sidcup District Council regarding the Sunday opening of cinemas since the rejection by this House of the Draft Order; and if he is aware that the proposed amalgamation of Chislehurst with Sidcup has been rejected by the Chislehurst Council, thus removing the chief objection to the Order?

Sir J. GILMOUR

On 17th February I informed the Sidcup Urban District Council of the rejection by this House of the Draft Order, and on the same day I received a copy of a resolution passed by the council on 15th February. As regards the proposed amalgamation of Chislehurst with Sidcup, I understand that this proposal forms part of the review of districts by the Kent County Council under Section 46 of the Local Government Act, 1929, that a local inquiry has been held and that the whole question, including a recent resolution of the Chislehurst Council against the proposed amalgamation, is now before the Minister of Health, with whom the decision rests.

Mr. THORNE

Was any reason given in the House for vetoing the vote of the people of Sidcup?

Sir J. GILMOUR

I understand that there was 'a Debate and a vote on the Subject.

Mr. BATEY

Are we to understand that, as the decision rests with the Minister, it is possible for him to renew the Order?

Sir J. GILMOUR

The decision does not rest with the Minister. My duty is to receive the record of any poll that is taken. As long as I am satisfied that the poll is correct, it is a matter for this House, and there, as far as I am concerned, my duty is at an end. It is open to the House to reject it or accept it.

Mr. BATEY

Can the Order that was rejected be submitted again to the House?

Sir J. GILMOUR

As far as I understand it, if they desire to raise the matter again they can do so, but it would rest, I understand, not with me but with Mr. Speaker as to whether he would accept another question within the present Session.

Mr. THORNE

Is the House entitled to rescind the decision given the other day?

Sir J. GILMOUR

If the matter comes before the House again, of course it will be competent for the House to rescind its former decision.