§ 51. Mr. SMITHERSasked the Secretary for Mines what was the amount of quota allocated to the country and to the districts for the last period of 12 months
STATEMENT of total allocations and outputs, district by district, and for Great Britain as a whole, for the year ended 31st March, 1933, the latest period of twelve months for which figures are available. | |||||
District. | Allocation. | Output as returned by the Executive Boards to the Central Council. | Excess (+) or Deficiency (-). | ||
Tons. | Tons. | Tons. | |||
Midland (Amalgamated) | … | … | 71,808,825 | 67,585,149 | - 4,223,676 |
South Wales | … | … | 40,513,934 | 36,476,665 | - 4,037,269 |
Scotland | … | … | 30,511,364 | 29,065,372 | - 1,445,992 |
Durham | … | … | 31,384,494 | 28,657,828 | - 2,726,666 |
Northumberland | … | … | 13,308,967 | 12,726,838 | - 582,129 |
Lancashire and Cheshire | … | … | 14,320,798 | 13,517,272 | - 803,526 |
North Staffs. | … | … | 5,721,979 | 5,759,503 | + 37,524 |
Warwick | … | … | 4,826,248 | 4,760,740 | - 65,508 |
Cannock Chase | … | … | 4,820,438 | 4,632,300 | - 188,138 |
North Wales | … | … | 3,210,281 | 2,982,746 | - 227,535 |
Cumberland | … | … | 1,968,188 | 1,665,306 | - 302,882 |
South Staffs. | … | … | 1,520,000 | 1,457,079 | - 62,921 |
Kent | … | … | 2,013,400 | 2,017,182 | + 3,782 |
Forest of Dean | … | … | 1,124,365 | 1,056,681 | - 67,684 |
Somerset | … | … | 784,322 | 726,256 | - 58,066 |
Shropshire | … | … | 654,500 | 644,855 | - 9,645 |
Bristol | … | … | 187,813 | 167,055 | - 20,758 |
GREAT BRITAIN | … | … | 228,679,916 | 213,898,827 | - 14,781,089 |
§ for which figures are available; and how much of it was unused in the country and in the districts?
§ The SECRETARY for MINES (Mr. Ernest Brown)As the reply involves a statistical statement, I will, with my hon. Friend's permission, circulate it in the OFFICIAL REPORT.
§ Mr. SMITHERSCan the hon. Gentleman say how much of this has been used?
§ Mr. BROWNDoes the hon. Member mean the figures for any particular district, or for the whole country?
§ Mr. SMITHERSFor the country as a whole.
§ Mr. SMITHERSDoes it not show that it is absurd that the Central Board should proceed to allocate certain tonnage, if the country are not allowed to use that tonnage even when they want more?
§ Mr. BROWNIf my hon. Friend would analyse the 17 sets of tables and the totals, he will find that there are great variations in all the districts.
§ Mr. SMITHERSHad not my hon. Friend better repeal Part I of the Act?
§ Following is the statement: