HC Deb 26 May 1932 vol 266 cc535-7
45. Mr. GROVES

asked the Prime Minister whether, in determining the composition of the committee to investigate the sugar-beet industry of this country, he will secure that it is judicial in character and contains no member interested in any way in the sugar-beet or any allied industry nor any official from any Government Department responsible for evolving or administering the subsidy scheme?

46. Captain PETER MACDONALD

asked the Prime Minister if he can now make any statement as to the composition of the committee that is to investigate the sugar-beet industry; and whether this committee is to consider the question of evolving an imperial sugar policy?

The LORD PRESIDENT of the COUNCIL (Mr. Baldwin)

I am not in a position to make any statement on this subject, but the suggestion of the hon. Member for Stratford (Mr. Groves) will be borne in mind.

Captain MACDONALD

Can the right hon. Gentleman say when he will be able to make a statement?

Mr. BALDWIN

No.

71. Mr. GROVES

asked the Minister of Agriculture what has been the percentage of molasses produced by the beet-sugar factories making white sugar since the passage of the Finance Act, 1928, as compared with the factories making raw sugar; what has been the tonnage of that molasses; what subsidy has been paid on it; and what was its market value after the subsidy had been paid?

Sir J. GILMOUR

As the answer contains a table of figures, I will, with permission, circulate it in the OFFICIAL REPORT.

Following is the answer:

The information asked for in the first three parts of the question is as follows:

I regret that I am unable to answer the last part of the question, but the prices received by the factories for molasses produced in the three years 1928–29 to 1930–31 averaged roughly £2 6s. 8d. per ton.