HC Deb 06 December 1932 vol 272 cc1407-9
15. Mr. MANDER

asked the President of the Board of Trade what steps are being taken to implement the pledge given by the Chancellor of the Exchequer that Dominion lead producers would not be allowed to exploit the British market as the result of the imposition of a duty on foreign lead?

Dr. BURGIN

A meeting has been held at the Board of Trade of representatives of producers and consumers of lead, to discuss the situation arising out of the Ottawa Agreements. The draft of an agreement, which includes a provision in regard to price, is now under consideration.

Sir J. WARDLAW-MILNE

Can the hon. Gentleman say whether the results of the discussions will be published?

Dr. BURGIN

I have no doubt that an opportunity will be taken, as was the case with the copper agreement, to make the agreement public when it has been signed.

49. Mr. JOEL

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether his attention has been called to the decision of the customs and excise authorities that duty amounting to £30,000 must be paid on a collection of modern diamond jewellery which it is desired to bring over to London from Paris for an exhibition and that such sum is not returnable when the jewellery is sent back to Paris after being shown; and whether, in view of the fact that such exhibition should be of benefit to the diamond industry of the Empire, he will arrange for the decision to be reconsidered?

The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER (Mr. Chamberlain)

My attention has been drawn to the case referred to by my hon. Friend. Customs duty at the rate of 30 per cent. ad valorem would be chargeable on the importation of jewellery in question under the provisions of the Import Duties Act, 1932, and the Additional Import Duties (No. 1) Order, 1932, and in the absence of a drawback under the Second Schedule to the Act, there is no provision in the law whereby the duty may be repaid on the exportation of the jewellery.

Mr. JOEL

In view of the probability of a similar situation arising on future occasions, will my right hon. Friend inquire into the possibility of treating goods brought into the country for exhibition purposes as though they are in bond?

Mr. CHAMBERLAIN

Obviously, a good many considerations will arise, and in any case legislation would be required.

Commander OLIVER LOCKER-LAMPSON

Do pictures coming into the country pay duty and get no drawback, and, if so, why?

Mr. CHAMBERLAIN

Because it is the law.

Commander LOCKER-LAMPSON

Will my right hon. Friend change the law?

Mr. HERBERT WILLIAMS

Has the Chancellor of the Exchequer considered the possibility of making the place of exhibition a constructive warehouse for the duration of the exhibition, which is permitted under the Import Duties Act?

Mr. CHAMBERLAIN

Yes, Sir, I have considered that, but I do not think it is practicable.

Forward to