§ Lieut.-Colonel HEADLAMI beg to move, in page 44, line 25, after "1921," to insert the words "(except Section forty-seven thereof)."
This is an Amendment similar to the one that we have already passed, designed to keep in force the existing machinery as to through rates.
§ Amendment agreed to.
§ Motion made, and Question proposed, "That the Clause, as amended, stand part of the Bill."
§ 6.43 p.m.
§ Mr. C. WILLIAMSDoes this Amendment mean that a railway will be able to charge a lower rate between stations within the area and to charge a higher rate for a longer journey outside the area? I live a long way off and I do not want the railways to be giving cheap fares to people who have to make a journey of only five or 10 miles, and then to put on a higher fare for those who live further away, and to whom it is an important matter. I want to protect the long-distance travelling public from having to pay higher fares in order to subsidise the short-distance travelling public.
§ Lieut.-Colonel HEADLAMIt means that if you run from stations A to Z on one railway and from stations Z to B on another railway the through fares shall maintain a level price for the same distance on both railways.
§ Mr. C. WILLIAMSThe level price can be maintained upwards or downwards. You are not going to subsidise the short-distance travelling at the expense of the long-distance travelling?