HC Deb 01 October 1931 vol 257 cc527-8
43. Mr. EDE

asked the President of the Board of Education by how many places the South Shields County Borough Council propose to increase the facilities for secondary education in their area; and what his decision has been on their application?

ELEMENTARY EDUCATION, 1930–31.
Local Education Authority. Product of penny rate per child. Rate levied. Cost per child. Board of Education Grants per child.
s. d. s. d. s. d. s. d.
Hastings 8 10 1 4.55 294 3 146 11
Eastbourne 15 1 10.59 302 4 150 11
Southport 11 0 1 1.32 278 0 140 5
Bournemouth 16 8 8.09 259 8 129 6
Merthyr Tydfil 1 5 5 9 316 1 215 2
Gateshead 2 0 3 9.62 215 4 130 3
Stoke-on-Trent 1 8 3 10.85 204 11 130 3
Rotherham 2 3 3 11.87 256 10 149 4
Sir D. MACLEAN

The local education authority for South Shields proposed, in their revised programme, to increase the secondary school provision in their area by about 200 places, and these proposals have been approved in principle by the Board. If and when detailed particulars are submitted, they will be further considered by the Board in the light of Circular 1413.

Mr. EDE

Am I to take it, therefore, that the right hon. Gentleman will be prepared to accept these proposals?

Sir D. MACLEAN

No, I cannot give any such undertaking until the matter is fully considered.

Forward to