HC Deb 19 March 1931 vol 249 cc2115-6
1. Mr. DOUGLAS HACKING

asked the Minister of Labour the number of

THE FOLLOWING TABLE shows, for each Administrative Division of Great Britain, the total number of persons on the registers of Employment Exchanges at 9th March, 1931, and the increases in the numbers as compared with a week before, a month before, and a year before.
Division. Number on Register at 9th March, 1931. Increase (+) or decrease (-) as compared with
2nd March, 1931 9th February, 1931. 10th March, 1930.
London 269,799 +505 +671 +110,844
South-Eastern 122,580 +2,159 -1,754 +50,587
South-Western 130,508 +1,332 -481 +49,061
Midlands 392,039 +20,623 +31,333 +187,725
North-Eastern 582,996 +22,205 +27,822 +255,563
North-Western 636,825 +2,262 -27,276 +238,726
Scotland 357,903 +9,308 +11,998 +169,532
Wales 199,087 -1,231 +12,293 +65,892
Great Britain 2,691,737 +57,163 +54,606 +1,127,930
The increases between 2nd March and 9th March in the Midlands and North-Eastern Divisions were due mainly to temporary stoppages in the coalmining industry.
A detailed industrial analysis is not available for a date later than 23rd February. An analysis for that date is given in the Ministry of Labour Gazette for March.

cases within the past six months where decisions taken by courts of referees to refuse benefit have been submitted to the umpire; and the number of cases where the umpire has ruled in favour of the applicant and against the decisions of the courts?

The MINISTER of LABOUR (Miss Bondfield)

During the past six months the umpire allowed benefit in 3,118 cases, and disallowed benefit in 8,123 cases, a total of 11,241. The form in which the statistics are obtained does not enable me to give the further details asked for.

Mr. HACKING

Does that show that the present constitution of the courts is not very satisfactory?

Miss BONDFIELD

I should say not.

16. Sir HENRY BETTERTON

asked the Minister of Labour the districts and the industries which are responsible for the recent increase of the numbers on the unemployment register?

Miss BONDFIELD

As the reply includes a statistical table, I propose, with the hon. Member's permission, to circulate it in the OFFICIAL REPORT.

Sir H. BETTERTON

Is the increase due to the mines quota?

Miss BONDFIELD

I should be glad if the hon. Gentleman would study the tables.

Following is the reply:

Forward to