§ 11. Sir BERTRAM FALLEasked the Minister of Labour if she is aware that the wool-packing factory at Tavistock recently made a 10 per cent. reduction in wages; that all men employed had to accept this or leave; that the men who 2021 refused these lower wages have been adjudged ineligible for unemployment benefit, and that the wages for wool-packers at Tavistock were 35s. for a 54-hour week and, after the reduction, 31s. 6d.; and will she state on what grounds these men have been deprived of unemployment benefit?
§ Miss BONDFIELDI am having inquiries made, and will communicate the result to the hon. Member as soon as they are completed.
§ Sir B. FALLEIs there a minimum wage below which a man cannot be forced to work without losing his unemployment benefit?
§ Miss BONDFIELDThat depends on the nature of the agreement in his trade. Undoubtedly, there will be a minimum below which any man will not be expected to take a job.
Lieut.-Colonel Sir FREDERICK HALLDoes not the Government recognise that the products of sweated labour are coming into this country without any tariff?