HC Deb 12 May 1930 vol 238 cc1433-4
32. Mr. MARJORIBANKS

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs to what penalties foreigners are liable under the laws of the Soviet Union who contravene the law against the teaching of religion in Russia?

Mr. DALTON

I have no information on the subject. The actual text of the decision mentioned in my reply of the 7th of May has not yet reached me.

33. Mr. MARJORIBANKS

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs whether, having regard to the fact that no foreign minister of religion is allowed, under the laws of the Soviet Union, to pursue his vocation in that country, he will either negotiate with the Soviet Ambassador to secure exceptions to this law for British subjects, or take steps to warn British ministers of religion from visiting Russia, and to safeguard them when visiting or travelling there?

Mr. DALTON

My right hon. Friend does not consider that negotiation of the nature suggested would serve any useful purpose, or that any warning is necessary. As regards the last part of the question, I would observe that, owing to the presence of a British Ambassador at Moscow, His Majesty's Government now have at their disposal machinery for the protection of the interests of British subjects travelling in Russia, who are clearly now in a better position than before the re-establishment of diplomatic relations with the Soviet Union.

Mr. MARJORIBANKS

Having regard to the answer to Question No. 32, will the hon. Gentleman make inquiries as to exactly what benefits—

Mr. SPEAKER

We are now dealing with Question No. 33.

Mr. MARJORIBANKS

On a point of Order. These two questions have a very close relationship, and I am hoping to get a definite answer to Question No. 32, but not having—

Mr. SPEAKER

The hon. Member can ask a supplementary question to No. 33.

Sir A. KNOX

Will the hon. Gentleman consider—

HON. MEMBERS

Order!