HC Deb 07 July 1930 vol 241 cc193-6

Section two of the Finance Act, 1928, shall be amended by the addition to subsection (8) after the words "in respect of the oil so used" of the following words: or, in the case of a person using hydro-carbon oil as the raw material of his manufacture or as an element in the process of manufacture he may make application for relief to the commissioners and if it appears to the satisfaction of the commissioners that the applicant has at any time within the period of twelve months or such lesser period for which his accounts have last been made up used any quantity of hydro-carbon oil, either as a raw material or in the process of manufacture, he shall be entitled to obtain from the commissioners repayment of any duty which has been paid in respect of the oil so consumed, so however that no person shall receive repayment both under this sub-section and by way of drawback under sub-section six in respect of the same hydro-carbon oils.—[Mr. Womersley.]

Brought up, and read the First time.

Mr. WOMERSLEY

I beg to move, "That the Clause be read a Second time."

The tax on hydro-carbon oils was imposed in the 1928 Finance Act, and the intention was to derive revenue from oil used in internal combustion engines by means of a duty proportionate to their use. It has worked out as a direct tax on the essential raw materials for many important industries. Many of those important industries have to compete in the open market with products manufactured in other countries which have not this tax to pay. At the time this tax was imposed, pleas were made on all sides for exemption in respect to oils introduced for purely manufacturing purposes, and the arguments used against any exemptions of this character were that there would be great difficulty in dealing with evasion. People would claim exemption on account of oil that they wish to use for manufacturing purposes and would then use it for internal combustion engines. As a matter of fact, I believe the experience of the Department in the early days of the tax on these oils was that a considerable amount of expense was entailed in Revenue Officers going round to certify and to find out whether evasion had taken place.

Those who represented the fishing industry made a very strong plea to the then Chancellor of the Exchequer to grant exemption in favour of that industry and, on it being brought to his notice that it was possible so to frame regulations that these questions of supervision, inspection and the risk of evasion might be avoided, he accepted an Amendment which exempted the fishing industry from the tax. This new Clause has been drafted on the lines of the Amendment carried in the 1928 Bill, which exempted the fishing industry. I submit to the Chancellor of the Exchequer that this Clause provides an instrument to enable him to do that which he has already intimated his desire to do, namely, to give relief to those who are using hydro-carbon oils as an essential raw material in the processes of manufacture without entailing a great deal of expense to the Department which has to deal with the matter and without practically any risk of evasion taking place. I heard the Chancellor of the Exchequer say earlier in the evening that many of the new Clauses on the Order Paper were likely to be accepted. I am sanguine enough to believe that this Clause is one which he is going to accept. I do not propose to argue my case any further, because I expect to hear from the right hon. Gentleman that he is satisfied and is going to accept the Clause.

Mr. P. SNOWDEN

I am sorry to have to dash the sanguine hopes of the hon. Member. This is not a new Clause which I can accept. We discussed this matter on one of the first new Clauses which were dealt with this afternoon, and, although I was in sympathy with the object, I had to remind the Committee that I could not accept it. The cost, taken in conjunction with the earlier Amendment, would be not less than £500,000 a year, and for that reason I regret that I am unable to accept the proposed Clause.

Question, "That the Clause be read a Second time," put, and negatived.